Telemedicine home CPAP titration and follow-up in the COVID-19 scenario.

Introduction: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration was dramatically affected by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to increased biological risk. This study aimed to compare successful CPAP adaptation and compliance with home telemedicine CPAP titration with the usual method based on face-to-face visits. Methodology: A prospective cohort using telemedicine home CPAP titration and follow-up during the COVID-19 pandemic (TC) was compared with a retrospective cohort receiving face-to-face pre-pandemic home titration (RC). The TC included a subgroup with a smartphone application (TC-APP). Successful CPAP adaptation and compliance at 1 month of follow-up were the main endpoints, while patient satisfaction and costs were secondary endpoints. Results: 210 consecutive patients were evaluated (80 RC and 130 TC). 36 patients were in the TC-APP subgroup. CPAP titration was successful in 90% in RC versus 95% in TC and 100% in TC-APP. No compliance differences between groups were found at 1  month (4.79 h·night-1 RC, 4.33  h·night-1 TC and 4.59 h·night-1 TC-APP). Mean±sd patient satisfaction out of 10 was 7.69±2.05 in RC versus 9.02±0.64 in TC (p<0.001). 64% of the TC-APP subgroup reported that their telemedicine strategy influenced an increase in CPAP use (p=0.011). CPAP adaptation with follow-up had an estimated direct staff cost per patient of EUR 19.61±8.61 in TC with no smartphone application used versus EUR 23.79±9.94 in TC-APP (p=0.048). Conclusions: Telemedicine in CPAP titration and early follow-up is equivalent to the usual care in terms of successful adaptation and compliance, while achieving greater patient satisfaction.

Telemedicine home CPAP titration and follow-up in the COVID-19 scenario

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly prevalent chronic disease associated with important comorbidities such as traffic accidents, cardiovascular and metabolic diseases and mortality, among others [1]. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), a first-line therapy in moderate-severe OSA [2], has been proven successful in improving daytime sleepiness, quality of life, reducing traffic accidents [3], improving hypertension and paroxistical atrial fibrillation [4, 5]. However, 47% of successfully titrated patients abandon treatment within three years [5, 6]. Thus, early OSA and CPAP education with close follow-up is mandatory to achieve satisfactory CPAP compliance [6, 7]. In that context, telemedicine and telemonitoring through remote monitoring CPAP have become promising strategies [8, 9]. Recently, smartphone applications [10] and wearables [11] have been added as new suggested tools for improving CPAP compliance.

[COVID-19 associated pneumonia despite repeatedly negative PCR-analysis from oropharyngeal swabs]. / COVID-19-assoziierte Pneumonie trotz persistierend negativen PCR-Tests aus oropharyngealen Abstrichen.

PATIENT HISTORY AND CLINICAL FINDINGS: A 46-year old construction worker presented at the emergency department with two orthostatic syncopes. The patient complained of prolonged fever and coughs for 7 days which had not improved after oral treatment with sultamicillin for 5 days, prescribed by the patient's general practitioner. Physical examination showed high blood pressure due to previously known hypertension. Other vital signs without pathological findings. Pulmonary auscultation showed basal soft crackling noises of the left lung FINDINGS AND DIAGNOSIS: Laboratory examination showed increased values for LDH, pro-BNP and CRP and normal values for leucocytes and procalcitonin. Conventional X-Ray of the chest showed bipulmonal lateral atypical infiltrates. After the first PCR turned in negative another PCR-analysis for SARS-CoV-2 of a deep oral swab-sample was performed since the clinical, laboratory and radiological findings were typical for COVID-19. Again, SARS-CoV-2-RNA was not detected. A CT-scan of the chest showed bipulmonal lateral ground-glass attenuation, again typical for COVID-19 associated pneumonia. After a third attempt for a PCR-analysis of a deep oral swab-sample was negative, analysis of a sputum was performed which finally confirmed the diagnosis of COVID-19 associated pneumonia. THERAPY AND COURSE OF EVENTS: The patient was admitted for evaluation of syncopes and suspect of COVID-19 associated pneumonia. The patient was prophylactically isolated while the result of SARS-CoV-2-PCR from a deep oral swab was pending. Suspecting a possible secondary bacterial infection at the beginning, intravenous antibiotic treatment with ampicillin/sulbactam was initiated. While further examinations showed no indication for bacterial infection, antibiotics were discontinued after 3 days. Due to clinical recovery antiviral therapy was not performed after confirming the diagnosis. The patient was discharged 17 days after onset of first symptoms without any requirements for further isolation. CONCLUSION: This casuistic describes a case of COVID-19 associated pneumonia presenting with typical clinical features, laboratory and radiological findings. Detection of viral RNA was not successful from deep oral swab-samples despite repeated attempts. Finally, PCR-analysis of sputum confirmed the diagnosis. Analysis of deeper airway samples (sputum, bronchoalveolar lavage, tracheal secretions) or stool for SARS-CoV-2 should be performed in cases of evident clinical suspicion of COVID-19 and negative PCR results from deep oral swabs.